logo

logo

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Book Report: Ultimate Beer

Title: Ultimate Beer
Author: Michael Jackson
Date Published: 1998 (1st Edition)
ISBN:  0-7894-3527-6
A good sign someone likes Beer is you can be talking about Beer and say “Michael Jackson” and they don’t laugh.  Michael Jackson started writing about Beer in the 70s. No one else was back then.  He’s the guy.  Beer Books will have a forward written by him to add credibility.  It works.
All of his books are great.  Ultimate Beer stands out to me.  It is big, colorful, easy to read, and full of information.  By 1998, when this book was published, he had been writing about beer for over 20 years.  The writing is simple and to the point.  No more than four sentences are used to describe a beer. 
He had help on this one: a photographer named Steve Gorton and a research them consisting of: Lara Brekenfeld, Casey Clogg, Bryan Harrell, Andree Hoffmann, Britta Vetter, and Silke Wagler.  This book is not rushed and even though some information is dated it provides a wonderful reference for everything Beer.  Also looks great on a coffee table.  Could even be used as a coaster, since it is hardcover.
Sample:  So popular is beer, the world's best-selling alcoholic drink, that it is often taken for granted.  Yet scientific analysis shows that a glass of beer has within it as many aromas and flavors as a fine wine.  Not everyone understands this, but an increasing number of people do.


Monday, June 27, 2011

Cover Songs & Conflicts

If you live in North West Central Wisconsin you know all about Country Fest and Country Jam.  Even if you don’t live in North West Central Wisconsin odds are you’ve heard some crazy story about some crazy shit that went down either at Jam or Fest.  They both are large music festivals that get national acts to appear at.
Now my idea of Country Music is Nashville Skyline, Merle Haggard, David Allen Coe, and Hank(the first one).  The major bullet point that you should take away from this paragraph, is that Contemporary Country Music is making a large effort to appeal to as wide of an audience as possible. 
You often find Ipods with one song by an artist.  This greatly annoys me.  Why just one song?  Track the progression of that band.  Then again, not everyone is like me.  A good song is a good song.  I’m sure these “one song people” would scoff at my vinyl collection.  
Kid Rock.  If you followed the progression of Kid Rock took you’d be greatly confused.  Who is this guy?  Rapper Guy, Rocker Guy, or  Country Guy?  That’s really smart.  He can go anywhere, play any venue, and people will pay good money to be entertained by this guy.  VH1’s Behind the Music does a wonderful job explaining this.
National Acts get paid around a million dollars to show up.  That’s why they are National Acts.  People what to see them perform.  How far will you travel to see a band you like?  Some people measure how much they like a band by how many times they’ve seem ‘em.  Fine by me, each concert is different. 
For the most part if a National Act plays Fest one year they will play Jam the next.  Usually they even have to agree not to play in a certain radius around the area to make sure that if you want to see them you have to go to that festival.  Basically, the acts are the same at these two music festivals, if you ask me.
Brand Identity takes time to build.  The reputation of Country Fest is that it is a huge party.  The reputation of Country Jam is that it is a professional operation.  If your 18 you think Jam is lame.  You really shouldn’t take children to Fest.    
They are both professional operations that are huge parties.  They coexist just fine.  The reputations are the result of the layout.  Campgrounds at Fest are right there.  Campgrounds at Jam are separated.  It is by far easier to get into the campgrounds are Fest than Jam.
Conflicts happen.  Comparing one thing to another thing is bound to happen.  Beer is no different.  How does this beer/brewery compare with this beer/brewery.  Here are some examples that wisconsinbeerun will instigate:
Leinenkugel vs Point  (old, large, regional breweries)
Surly vs New Glarus  (the Packer/Vikings of Beer)
Capital vs Sprecher  (old school craft brewers)
South Shore vs Shipwrecked (Lake Superior vs Door County)
5 Star vs  Dave’s Brewfarm (whose gonna make the crazier beer?)
Sand Creek vs Dells Brewing Company (best pit stop on way to Madison)
Central Waters vs Tyranena (Battle of the Bourbon Barrels)
InBev vs SAB (don’t say Bud vs Miller, then it sounds like you’re talking about American Companies)
Spotted Cow vs Fat Tire vs Boston Lager (best Usual Suspect)
Lucette vs Rush River  (Menomonie vs River Falls)
I’m a huge fan of Professional Wrestling.  It’s not fake.  It’s Scripted.  There are good guys and bad guys.  They have conflicts and there is an obvious winner.  These Beer Conflicts will never have an obvious winner.  They are a matter of personal preference.
I’m never going to assign some letter grade of point value to a beer.  I will never improve on what ratebeer and beeradvocate are doing.  Beer History and Beer Styles is what wisconsinbeerun will focus on.  We’ll mention timely issues relative to Sports or Politics that people in Wisconsin might find interesting, but the focus will be on Beer History and Beer Styles.
If it is a Conflict Show the signature will be “happy hour at The Firehouse, closing down The Joynt” as opposed to “beers are song, breweries are bands; enjoy the music.”  This is to imply that a Beer Conflict will be evaluated from 5pm to 2am.  Not just “this beer is better, that beer sucks.”
Cover songs are a lot of fun.  Country Fest and Country Jam always have great cover songs.  It is a sign of respect to recognize what came before you.  Will you improve on it?       

Sunday, June 26, 2011

A Growing Market

If you ever took a marketing class you probably heard of something called the 80/20 rule, or better yet the Pareto Principle, it states that 80% of your revenue will be purchased by 20% of your customers.  More simply: it is likely that a core group of heavy users will form.
Advertising is expensive.  If a company can afford advertising they are either trying to gain that 20% of customers or protect the amount of money they are currently spending on that product.  With the advent of smart phones everyone can now know everything.  You can’t fool people anymore.
Well…you can fool people, it’s just not as easy in 2011 as it was it the 50s, 60s, and 70s.  Today’s consumers are better informed and are beginning to demand more of the products they consume than ever before.     
McDonalds realized this.  After the movie “Super Size Me” by Morgan Spurlock slammed them for being super unhealthy.  To counter they did away with the phrase “Super Size Me” and began to offer healthy alternatives to the corn and soy swill they typically swindle.  Result?  They made more money.
Fast food is a great battle ground for television ads.  They are national firms competing against other national firms.  They are well funded and become part of the American Culture.  Fast food isn’t always my first choice.  But, I know exactly what I will be getting and sometimes that is nice.
John Zappa of Point Brewery put it best at a Gordy’s Brew Crew VIP Event.  “Well known name, small brewery, big beer business…we have a rich history…the advent of television killed the small brewery…they all tasted different, they were all supposed to taste different…we survived that whole thing.”  He’s talking about the Dark Ages of American Beer, where big companies out advertized small companies.
Consistency is the toughest thing about the service industry.  Don’t confuse people.  If the average customer doesn’t know what to expect they stay away.
I’m not the average customer.  I’m a 1%er.  I enjoy advertising. However, it is not changing my mind.  Sure it gives me ideas of reference, but major beer companies spend A LOT of money on national ad campaigns.  They offset this cost by charging more for their product than they should.  Beer in Europe is WAY cheaper. 
From a Service Industry standpoint: Would you rather deal 20 customer paying 5$ or 1 customer paying 100$?  Pricing a product is no easy decision.  The low price/high volume game will always be a part of commerce.
A quality experience is what everyone wants.  In Eau Claire, Lame Beer is 3.50$(tip not included) a pint while Good Beer is typically 5$(tip included) a pint.  If someone is looking for a cheap night, will they tip well?   

Our Mascot, SPARGE a Malaysian Tree Shrew

Monday, June 13, 2011

Wisconsin Beer Purity Law of 2011

Belgian Beer is the best in the world.  Sure that notion is open for debate, however in an actual debate with actual beer people the conclusion that “Belgian Beer is the best in the world” is typically achieved in less than five minutes.  Belgian Beer would destroy every Beer Economy there is if no laws were put in play to prevent Belgian Beer from entering that country.
Reinheitsgebot is the best example of such a law.  Like Lebensraum and Kristallnacht, Reinheitsgebot is a German word that we Anglophiles joyfully struggle to verbalize.  The awkward guttural nature and complete lack of grammar laws make German amusing to us, as if swine are trying to talk to us.  Reinheitsgebot is also referred as “The German Purity Law of 1516.”
Lots of places that make beer like to say they follow “The German Purity Law of 1516.”  They like to say that the law was put in play to ensure that only barley, hops, water and yeast are used in making beer.  Despite the fact Germans had not idea yeast existed until a Frenchman told them so.  This notion is greatly Goebbelsized. 
The real purpose of Reinheitsgebot was to keep Belgian Beer out of Germany.  Belgian Beer is factorially superior to German Beer; therefore people would much rather drink Belgian Beer.  Instead of pulling teeth, which is a common way for Germans to generate wealth, the greedy Huns decided to ban Belgian Beer all together.  This allowed their inferior German Beer to be consumed by the at large public which enjoyed Belgian Beer much, much more.
The Germans further took out their disdain for Belgian Beer by invading Belgium several times and destroying their Beer Making Centers in a scorched earth campaign that would make General Sherman’s March to the Sea seem like an unorganized temper tantrum.  The destruction of their country did not stop the Belgians from making better beer than any other country.  In fact, it inspired them to one day take over the World Beer Economy.  This is known as the Schlieffen Plan.
This day has come.  Jupiler is rumored to be unleashed on Wisconsin soon.  Jupiler would be the “knockout punch” that the stagnant Wisconsin Beer Economy has feared for the past decade.  We must stop this from happening.  That is if we value the Wisconsin Beer Economy.   Join us in our fight against Belgian Beer.
The first six paragraphs are an example of propaganda.  Sure there are some facts in them, but the primary goal is to use fear to get you to believe something.  Fear is a very strong motive.  If you are afraid you are not thinking clearly. 
Jupiter is already in Wisconsin.  It is called something else.  If you dig hard enough you’ll find out exactly what I’m talking about.  
The whole Beer Subculture is very complex and it may sound like I know what I’m talking about.  I do not.  I’m not in and never have been in the industry.  I simply go out to the bars three to four nights a week and spent around fifteen dollars a night. 
Fifteen bucks can mean two pints or fifteen bucks can mean three pitchers.  I drink different beers.  I get curious.  I ask questions.  I research my questions.  I surround myself with information.  I don’t homebrew nor do I work for anyone whose primary goal is to sell beer.   
A week or so ago I heard rumblings about this new beer law that would happen to Wisconsin.  I talked to some people who had an understanding of what was happening.
Dave Hoops, of Fitger’s Brewhouse in Duluth, said that Wisconsin has “…the most liberal, most friendly, most all encompassing beautiful beer laws in the country.” 
Rick Sauer, formally of Twin Ports currently with Brady’s Brewhouse, said, “When I started there weren’t any limitations.  You could have a brewery with a tasting room, restaurant, you could self distribute, you could just do whatever, cuz Wisconsin is all about beer.  Which is awesome.”  
Leos Frank, the Czech born brewer behind Eau Claire’s Lazy Monk, said “Losing self disturbing right would be devastating for me. It could actually put me out of business.  So that’s my biggest concern.”
Jim Wiesender, Sand Creek Brewing Company, was nice enough to talk to me for about an hour at Willow River Blues and Brews in New Richmond.  His interview is worth listening to if you’d like a better understanding what is going on.  Highlights include:  “What I find extraordinary stealthy about this whole thing is how it was slide into the budget.”  “It should have never got introduced into the budget, because of this now we’re scrambling with only two weeks’ notice.” “For me it falls into the Chicken Little the sky is falling thing, but I’m a small brewer.”  “If this is a threat to Wisconsin, I have a hard time believing this.” “You start to have to ask yourself, what is going on here?” “Why do they want to take our wholesaling away from us?” “It squelches business is what this really does.” “It needs to have open debate; it affects a lot of businesses.” “The politicians have been sold a bill of goods; they are not listening to the small guy.” “The craft brewing segment is adding jobs to Wisconsin.” “I can’t point a finger at the Governor on this one because this guy is all about jobs.  He may be our last line of defense going this is a bad thing for Wisconsin. Bang. Give me the red marker we’re gonna knock it out.  We sincerely hope he does this if it gets that far.  We’re hoping we come up with a good compromise.”  “Don’t mess with the small guy.”
Off the record someone told me, “Its bullshit.  The wholesalers pull this kinda shit every few years.  Powerful lobbyists.”
Another off the record quote.  “What I do is all about Beer Culture, all the different styles and all.  This would destroy Beer Culture. ”
To return to the German bashing of paragraphs 2, 3, 4, and 5 I’ll now quote Pastor Martin Niemoller:  “First they came for the Jews and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.  Then they came for the Unions and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t in a Union.  Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.”